data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ab87/9ab874e6fafdc61ea3994e1eecf5c30e7e63c1fd" alt="Download native instruments maschine mk3 and ableton 10"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f40d8/f40d8b3b4de12941eb7001a268b8c27fdb2a71b0" alt="download native instruments maschine mk3 and ableton 10 download native instruments maschine mk3 and ableton 10"
So it’s very immediate to start making tracks. With push, I can just turn push on and open live and just go. Would I really need these hardware machines or hold off to get used to pusH2/MACHINE MK3?ġ I feel like there a balance as far as being productive goes. I will be adding dt/dn combo and am looking to add m-32, dfam, nyx, and vermona eventually. I do have octatrack left after my huge gear sell off. As well as being able to do bass riffs, drones, down tempo off the linear graph, humanizing, off kilter stuff and grid based 4 to the floor if needed. I’m interested in the unit that’s capable of ease of use for modulation recording, sample and sample mangle during a perfamnce, impromtue live performing. Push 2 with Live 10 obviously has step sequences for drum and now keys. I asked Machine MK3 with the Jam bc I can see how Jam would help with step sequences over the Machine unless I’m wrong here. I have no daw experience so I am unbiased between the two ecosystems. All of you with your user experience of Machine MK3 on the NI side of things and those of you with Push 2 with Albelton Live 10 experience I’d like to hear why you chose one over the other or why you made the choice of one over the other.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ab87/9ab874e6fafdc61ea3994e1eecf5c30e7e63c1fd" alt="Download native instruments maschine mk3 and ableton 10"